A notice about cookies

This website uses cookies. Some cookies may have been set already. To find out more about our use of cookies you can visit our Privacy policy. By browsing this website, you agree to our use of cookies.

 
BETA

This is a prototype - your feedback will help us to improve it.

Press Release

Government Publishes PWC Independent Review of Escalation in National Children Hospital Costs

Published: 9 April 2019
From: Department of the Taoiseach

Issued by the Government Press Office

The Government has today published the Report on the Independent Review of Escalation in National Children’s Hospital Costs carried out by PWC, and accepted its recommendations.

The Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform & the Minister for Health will revert to Government in a month to outline an implementation plan for the recommendations contained in the Report.

The Report acknowledges that the National Children's Hospital is a project which is unique in scope, scale and complexity in comparison to any other health infrastructure project in Ireland's history and is explicit in stating that the project's complexity should not be understated. However, it identified a series of weaknesses in terms of set-up, planning, budget, execution, and governance.

The Report says that the vast majority of the €450 million increases was down to an underestimation of the real cost of the project. Other factors include consequential costs like VAT, delays and changes to regulation and building standards.

The National Children’s Hospital is a vital and much needed project. It is recognised that a programme of work of this nature can never be fully de-risked. Many difficult issues have been overcome which have brought us beyond the false starts of the past. Nevertheless, it is clear from the findings and recommendations that there were significant weaknesses which led to escalation of cost which only became known at far too late a point in the process.

The report also considered the alternative option of re-tendering the works. It concluded that this was an unrealistic fall-back option and would have increased costs further and would have in all likelihood resulted in no hospital being built.

The priority now is to ensure that the National Paediatric Hospital Board and the Executive are fully focused on ensuring enhanced delivery and oversight arrangements which deliver the most significant healthcare investment ever undertaken by the State, one that will have an impact on children, young people and their families in Ireland for decades to come.

The report makes recommendations both in respect of the National Children’s Hospital and capital infrastructure projects generally. It is clear that there are lessons to be learned both in relation to this project and other major capital projects. This includes strengthening the rules that govern public sector spending and providing a central assurance and challenge function to provide consistent challenge and review of major projects through their lifecycles.

The Taoiseach stated that:

“The PWC report makes grim reading. The report finds the escalating costs of the new National Children’s Hospital related largely to an underestimation of the cost of building it in the first place, as well as the cost of delays, higher building standards and the knock-on effect of VAT. It does not recommend retendering as a feasible option and suggests there is little scope for savings.
“Our priority now must be to finish the job on time to meet the 2023 opening date, contain further cost increases and learn from the mistakes made in advance of other major projects like Metro and the National Broadband Plan.”

Note to Editors:

Recommendations from the PWC Report

Children's Hospital Project

  • The project control environment should be overhauled to bring it up to the level of maturity and sophistication required for a project of the scale, complexity and importance of the NPH project;
  • Comprehensive plans should be developed to mitigate the residual risks identified;
  • A Project Assurance Strategy should be developed and implemented for the remainder of the NPH Project;
  • The commercial capability and capacity of the NPH Executive should be strengthened so that it is more self-sufficient and less reliant on external advisors;
  • The Executive of the NPH should be strengthened in the short term to support the planning and execution of the next phase;
  • Consideration should be given to opportunities for the closer working of the NHPDB and the SHI Board. This should include the potential for some shared appointments to promote integration and to address skills gaps;
  • The NHPDB should request confirmation of a number of key decisions in relation to the procurement / approach for medical, ICT and electronic health records to enable effective planning for the next phase of the programme;
  • The scope and responsibilities of the advisory firms that constitute the Design Team should be reviewed to reflect their future roles;
  • In view of the potential consequential programme risks, a scrutiny process that includes all levels of the governance structure should be put in place.

Other Capital Infrastructure Projects

  • The rules that govern public sector spending on major capital projects should be strengthened. The standards to which business cases must adhere should be more clearly defined and robustly enforced; and
  • A central assurance and challenge function should provide consistent challenge to and review of major projects through their lifecycles.